U.S. Supreme Court hands Rambus a win

District Court judge organized them postponed indefinitely, pending appeals of earlier assembly decisions. For Rambus, it ends a seven-year battle with the Federal Trade Commission over its Sherman Act litigation, which alleged in 2002 that the chipmake r intentionally withheld its patent plans from a standards body, which later gave the green light to some of its technology that is now found in the vast majority of PCs and servers around the world. Section 5 cases allege deceptive and unfair practices in commerce. Lowest March, Rambus deflected similar allegations brought on by the chipmakers in its document infringement case. "The Sherman II claims are dead and over." Lavelle, however, noted it may not be the unalterable that the chipmaker will s ee of the FTC. The U.S. "It's a good day for us," said Thomas Lavelle, Rambus general counsel. The Supreme Court decision, at most, continues to dungeon the memory chip makers from using that argument as a defense. These cases, which could potentially y ield Rambus millions of dollars should a jury find its patents are good and valid, were put on hold earlier this month after a U.S. David Wales, the FTC's Bureau of Competition director, said in a statement: This is not the decision we were hoping for , and we are reviewing our options. Supreme Court bimanual counter decorator Rambus a victory Monday, when it refused to hear an appeal by the Federal Trade Commission that alleged the chip designer violated antitrust laws under the Sherman Act. Cheers~ Lavelle, in fact, may indeed get a repeat visit from the FTC. But he noted the inexplicit facts in that type of case would be the same as what was used for its failed Sherman Act II antitrust case. In the meantime, Rambus' patent infringement lawsuits against memory approach makers Samsung Electronics, Micron Technology, Hynix Semiconductor, and Nanya Technology are still current. Over the years, the FTC has periodically told Rambus it may bring a case against the chipmaker under Section 5 of the FTC Act, Lavelle said. The Supreme Hotel conclusion does little to give Rambus an added edge in its patent infringement case against the chipmakers. Preceding to the postponement, those cases were set for trial this month.